Know Your Legal Obligations Under the Americans with Disabilities Act
Kirsch CPA Group
May 13, 2021

In recent years, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has annually fielded around 25,000 alleged violations related to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). And while the majority of these claims are deemed unworthy of action by the EEOC, you don’t want your company to be the exception. The average award in settled cases is roughly $60,000.
Here’s some important background on ADA claims and some recent cases that provide valuable lessons for employers.
ADA Myths and Misconceptions
The EEOC states that certain “myths” about the 30-year-old ADA have skewed the way some employers view its requirements. Perhaps the most basic, yet widely accepted myth is that the ADA forces employers to hire unqualified individuals with disabilities.
What’s the truth? According to the EEOC: “Applicants who are unqualified for a job cannot claim discrimination under the ADA.” In addition, employers aren’t required to give preference to qualified people with disabilities over others who don’t have a disability.
Many people also believe that employers “must give people with disabilities special privileges, known as accommodations.” It’s true that employers covered by the ADA (meaning those having at least 15 employees) are required to make reasonable accommodations. But the misunderstanding is in what’s deemed “reasonable.”
The EEOC defines reasonable modifications as: “Modifications to a job, work environment or the way work is performed that allows an individual with a disability to apply for a job, perform the essential functions of the job, and enjoy equal access to benefits available to other individuals in the workplace.”
Accommodations often involve no direct cost to an employer, but when there is a cost, it’s typically around $500.
Case Round-Up
Here are four recent cases brought by the EEOC. Each illustrates a specific category of ADA violations and how the concept of reasonable accommodations looks from a legal enforcement perspective.
1. Preemptive termination I. An employee was hospitalized for several weeks with pancreatitis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and pneumonia. Ultimately the person was cleared by a physician to return to work without restrictions. At that point, however, he was deemed by his employer to be a “liability” to the company and was terminated. The reason given was that, due to his health condition, he was at risk of being injured on the job.
Terminating an employee based on “a disability or perceived disability” violates the ADA, the EEOC stated. “Too often employers rely on unfounded assumptions about an employee’s ability to do his job, rather than the results of a medical examination.” The company paid $85,000 to the employee in monetary relief as part of the settlement.
2. Preemptive termination II. The second case also involved the termination of an employee with a serious health condition. In this situation, the employer cited an industry standard as the basis for its decision. The terminated employee was a commercial diver who maintained his job while undergoing radiation and chemotherapy cancer treatment. He took a leave of absence for surgery but was terminated when he sought to return to work. Industry guidelines suggest people who have had cancer within the past five years are, in general, unfit to perform that kind of work.
But, the EEOC noted that those guidelines also call on employers “to make individualized medical assessments,” which this employer failed to do. More importantly, the ADA has a similar requirement, and the law supersedes industry guidelines. “This lawsuit reminds employers that the ADA takes precedence over internal policy or trade association guidelines,” the EEOC commented. The company agreed to pay $125,000 in monetary relief.
3. Failure to accommodate. Here, an employer accepted a $160,000 settlement after backing away from a “reasonable accommodation” arrangement with an employee. The worker developed a serious ailment in both feet and was urged by her physician to stay off her feet as much as possible. Her employer initially agreed to allow her to telecommute. But after a week, the employee was placed on unpaid leave without benefits, and it didn’t appear that she would be allowed to return to her job.
The employer’s decision was “unilateral” and made “despite the fact that she could perform the essential functions of her job from home,” according to the EEOC. “An employer should accommodate an employee who can perform the essential functions of the position with a limited period of telework if it does not impose an undue hardship” on the employer, it added. The outcome of the case was affected by the employer acting without a required “interactive process” to seek a reasonable compromise and the failure to give the telecommuting arrangement a longer trial period.
4. Job offer withdrawn. The ADA protects job applicants as well as employees. This case involves an individual who had been offered a job but had to defer the date of reporting for work due to a sudden pregnancy-related disability. Specifically, the woman developed preeclampsia, and, five days prior to her scheduled start date, had to undergo premature induced labor. She immediately informed the employer by email.
“Within hours, she received a voicemail from [the employer] withdrawing the offer of employment, even though she needed only the minor accommodation of delaying her start date by several weeks,” according to the EEOC. “The law requires that employers engage with applicants and employees to provide reasonable accommodations for disabilities,” commented the EEOC. Although the case hasn’t yet run its course, the EEOC stated that it “underscores that pregnancy-related disabilities are covered by the ADA.”
Contact us to learn more about Americans with Disabilities Act
© Copyright 2021. All rights reserved.

About The Author
Kirsch CPA Group is a full service CPA and business advisory firm helping businesses and organizations with accounting,…
Tags
Sign Up for Email Updates
Related Articles



Tax Treatment of Debt Forgiveness: Watch Out for Tax Bills Delivered COD
- 01-18-23
- Kirsch CPA Group












Manufacturers: Be Aware of These 3 Business Tax Provisions Currently in Limbo
- 01-18-23
- Kirsch CPA Group



The Tax Deductible Mileage Rate for Business Driving Increases for 2023
- 01-04-23
- Kirsch CPA Group









Succession Planning Considerations for Construction Business Owners
- 12-14-22
- Kirsch CPA Group






Prevent Fraud at Your Construction Company With a Holistic Approach
- 11-30-22
- Kirsch CPA Group









Manufacturers Must Act Now to Maximize Depreciation-Related Tax Breaks for 2022
- 11-09-22
- Kirsch CPA Group



It’s Time for Businesses to Rethink Their Working Capital Practices
- 11-09-22
- Kirsch CPA Group









Social Security Wage Base and Earnings Test Amounts Increase in 2023
- 10-27-22
- Kirsch CPA Group



New Law Enhances Payroll Tax Break for Small Manufacturers’ Research Expenses
- 10-13-22
- Kirsch CPA Group







































How Buy-Sell Agreements Factor into Business Owners’ Estate Plans
- 09-14-22
- Kirsch CPA Group









SALT Cap Workaround Law Could Save Ohio Business Owners Over $100 Million
- 08-31-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
























How Manufacturing Companies Can Benefit from the Section 179 Expensing Deduction
- 08-04-22
- Kirsch CPA Group



























Could the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Help Your Construction Company?
- 06-23-22
- Kirsch CPA Group






Good News: IRS Boosts Standard Mileage Rates for Second Half of 2022
- 06-23-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
























Education Benefits Can Help You Recruit and Retain Smart Employees
- 05-26-22
- Kirsch CPA Group









Ensure Your Construction Accounting System Has the Right Features
- 05-12-22
- Kirsch CPA Group





















John Kirsch Named to Greater Butler and Warren Counties Business Hall of Fame
- 03-25-22
- Diane Glover






Manufacturers Need to Act Soon to Take Advantage of 100% First-year Bonus Depreciation
- 03-17-22
- Kirsch CPA Group



























Commission Fraud: Salespeople Getting Paid More Than They’ve Earned
- 02-04-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
















































Consider a New Approach to Meeting Your Business Real Estate Need
- 09-17-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
























Beware: Teleworking Arrangements May Cause State Tax Withholding Issues
- 08-18-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
























5 Common Construction Accounting Risks — and How to Address Them
- 07-07-21
- Kirsch CPA Group















Supreme Court Finds No Standing to Challenge a Provision of the ACA
- 06-24-21
- Kirsch CPA Group






Labor Shortage: Unlock Solutions by Evaluating Your Employment Value Proposition
- 06-09-21
- Kirsch CPA Group









Material Participation Standard is the Key to Unlocking LLC Tax Losses
- 05-27-21
- Kirsch CPA Group

































PPP Loan Not Forgiven? There’s a Safe Harbor for Deducting Expenses
- 12-03-20
- Kirsch CPA Group












What You Need to Know About the Deferral of Payroll Tax Obligations
- 09-15-20
- Kirsch CPA Group


















PPP Loan Forgiveness – Significant Borrower Friendly Changes on the Horizon
- 06-04-20
- John Kirsch





















Tax Filing Deadline Remains April 15 – Payment Due Extended to July 15
- 03-19-20
- John Kirsch








































































Prepare to Receive a Social Security Administration No-Match Letter
- 10-15-19
- Kirsch CPA Group





















IRS Announces Changes for Personal Use of Employer-Provided Vehicles
- 06-10-19
- Diane Glover






























Watch Out for these Tax Issues When Planning for Your Business in 2018
- 06-26-18
- Diane Glover









What Image Does Your Organization Present to Large Contributors?
- 03-15-18
- Kirsch CPA Group



8 strategies to help you adapt to economic down turn without layoffs
- 02-24-18
- Diane Glover













































Remember To Take Required Minimum Distributions at Age 70 1/2 Or Face Penalties
- 02-17-17
- Sue Schloemer







































Time is Money: Don’t Spend Valuable Time Inputting Data into QuickBooks
- 06-18-22
- Diane Glover




