Non-Compete Agreements: Finding the Right Balance
Sue Schloemer
Jul 18, 2016
Non-compete agreements have long been a staple of executive employment contracts. Today, however, they’re becoming increasingly common even in lower-level jobs. According to the Wall Street Journal, a steady rise in litigation over non-competes “largely reflects the increased usage of non-compete arrangements among lower-level staffers, along with employees’ greater mobility and access to sensitive information.”
It might seem like overkill to require a non-compete agreement with employees below the executive level. However, an individual’s ability to damage your business by going to work for a competitor will grow over time — assuming the employee gains responsibility and knowledge that could help a competitor. If you don’t secure a non-compete agreement at the beginning of an employment relationship, you’ll probably need to jump through an extra hoop to make it legally enforceable later on.
State Law Rules
State law governs non-compete agreements, and some of the rules vary from one state to the next. In an extreme case, California generally doesn’t recognize the validity of these agreements at all.
Federal courts may also sometimes get involved. One federal court recently weighed in on a case and upheld a common principle — the need for an employee to receive “consideration” (some form of compensation) in exchange for accepting a non-compete agreement.
Ordinarily, being offered a job is deemed to be adequate consideration in itself. However, if an employee has already been working for a while, simply being allowed to keep the job might not be deemed adequate consideration. That’s how the U.S. District Court in Hawaii came down on the issue in the case of The Standard Register Co. v. Keala (No. 14-00291 JMS-RLP).
“Numerous courts have held that where an employee has already been hired, continued at-will employment, standing alone, is insufficient consideration for a non-competition agreement,” the court held, and denied the employer’s request for a temporary restraining order against former employees.
Is the Agreement Enforceable?
One possibility for “consideration” in that situation might have been a bonus or a promotion. However, courts aren’t always predictable in what they’ll uphold. Here are other key facets of a non-compete agreement that courts examine:
- Does it protect a legitimate business interest? For example, let’s say you claim that an employee possesses sensitive information which could harm you if it fell into a competitor’s hands. Unless there’s evidence that you made a real effort to protect the secrecy of that information, a court may decide your stated business interest isn’t legitimate.
- What is the duration of the agreement? Courts are sympathetic to the idea that people need to earn a living. Therefore, they often frown on agreements that restrict former employees for periods longer than, for example, six months. But “reasonable” limits vary by circumstances and courts.
- What are the geographic parameters? A court will try to determine reasonableness here based on the size of your market. If you don’t have many competitors beyond a certain distance, such as a 10-mile radius, you wouldn’t be able to justify an agreement based on a 50-mile radius. Again, there’s considerable variability in this parameter.
- What activity is prohibited? The broader the scope of the prohibition, the less likely the agreement is to be enforceable. The most “reasonable” restriction in the eyes of the majority of courts is against soliciting your customers.
Red Pencil, Blue Pencil
If a court reviews a non-compete agreement and finds fault with it, there are three possible outcomes — depending on the state. The most restrictive standard is known as the “red pencil” rule. It requires the invalidation of an entire agreement even if only one provision is flawed. Nebraska takes the position, and South Carolina, Virginia and Wisconsin generally do as well.
Under the less draconian “blue pencil” standard, courts are allowed to invalidate specific provisions of an agreement, while leaving other ones standing. Arizona, Connecticut, Indiana, Maryland, Montana and North Carolina generally take that approach.
The best scenario is “reformation,” which is permitted in approximately 30 states. This is where the court can actually rewrite the agreement to allow it to be as faithful as possible to the employer’s original intent, but only to the extent permissible by law. That way, you might win a partial victory if you’re still allowed to restrict the former employee’s activities, even if not as thoroughly as you’d hoped.
Not all states fall into such tidy categories, and their positions evolve. Wherever you’re located, you will need to consult with a qualified attorney to draft a non-compete agreement that will hold up to local scrutiny.
Also, many job applicants will take a dim view of a requirement to sign this type of contract. With that in mind, you’ll need to balance your eagerness to hire a particular applicant with the consideration you’re willing to offer to make the agreement more palatable. Otherwise, the non-compete agreement could be a deal breaker. Consult your legal adviser for more information.
About The Author
Sue enjoys helping clients succeed. Her breadth and depth of accounting knowledge combined with over 25 years of…
Tags
Sign Up for Email Updates
Related Articles
Do You Know How SECURE 2.0 Will Affect Your Manufacturing Company?
- 03-16-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
Top 3 Federal Tax Law Changes that Could Affect Your Business Return
- 03-02-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
What Are the Most Common Form 990 Mistakes Not-for-Profits Make?
- 02-16-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
8 Ways to Insulate Your Construction Company Against Rising Costs
- 02-10-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
Tax Treatment of Debt Forgiveness: Watch Out for Tax Bills Delivered COD
- 01-18-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
Manufacturers: Be Aware of These 3 Business Tax Provisions Currently in Limbo
- 01-18-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
The Tax Deductible Mileage Rate for Business Driving Increases for 2023
- 01-04-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
Succession Planning Considerations for Construction Business Owners
- 12-14-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Prevent Fraud at Your Construction Company With a Holistic Approach
- 11-30-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Manufacturers Must Act Now to Maximize Depreciation-Related Tax Breaks for 2022
- 11-09-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
It’s Time for Businesses to Rethink Their Working Capital Practices
- 11-09-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Social Security Wage Base and Earnings Test Amounts Increase in 2023
- 10-27-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
New Law Enhances Payroll Tax Break for Small Manufacturers’ Research Expenses
- 10-13-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
How Buy-Sell Agreements Factor into Business Owners’ Estate Plans
- 09-14-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
SALT Cap Workaround Law Could Save Ohio Business Owners Over $100 Million
- 08-31-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
How Manufacturing Companies Can Benefit from the Section 179 Expensing Deduction
- 08-04-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Could the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Help Your Construction Company?
- 06-23-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Good News: IRS Boosts Standard Mileage Rates for Second Half of 2022
- 06-23-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Education Benefits Can Help You Recruit and Retain Smart Employees
- 05-26-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Ensure Your Construction Accounting System Has the Right Features
- 05-12-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
John Kirsch Named to Greater Butler and Warren Counties Business Hall of Fame
- 03-25-22
- Diane Glover
Manufacturers Need to Act Soon to Take Advantage of 100% First-year Bonus Depreciation
- 03-17-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Commission Fraud: Salespeople Getting Paid More Than They’ve Earned
- 02-04-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Consider a New Approach to Meeting Your Business Real Estate Need
- 09-17-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
Beware: Teleworking Arrangements May Cause State Tax Withholding Issues
- 08-18-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
5 Common Construction Accounting Risks — and How to Address Them
- 07-07-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
Supreme Court Finds No Standing to Challenge a Provision of the ACA
- 06-24-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
Labor Shortage: Unlock Solutions by Evaluating Your Employment Value Proposition
- 06-09-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
Material Participation Standard is the Key to Unlocking LLC Tax Losses
- 05-27-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
Know Your Legal Obligations Under the Americans with Disabilities Act
- 05-13-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
PPP Loan Not Forgiven? There’s a Safe Harbor for Deducting Expenses
- 12-03-20
- Kirsch CPA Group
What You Need to Know About the Deferral of Payroll Tax Obligations
- 09-15-20
- Kirsch CPA Group
PPP Loan Forgiveness – Significant Borrower Friendly Changes on the Horizon
- 06-04-20
- John Kirsch
Tax Filing Deadline Remains April 15 – Payment Due Extended to July 15
- 03-19-20
- John Kirsch
Prepare to Receive a Social Security Administration No-Match Letter
- 10-15-19
- Kirsch CPA Group
IRS Announces Changes for Personal Use of Employer-Provided Vehicles
- 06-10-19
- Diane Glover
Watch Out for these Tax Issues When Planning for Your Business in 2018
- 06-26-18
- Diane Glover
What Image Does Your Organization Present to Large Contributors?
- 03-15-18
- Kirsch CPA Group
8 strategies to help you adapt to economic down turn without layoffs
- 02-24-18
- Diane Glover
Remember To Take Required Minimum Distributions at Age 70 1/2 Or Face Penalties
- 02-17-17
- Sue Schloemer
Time is Money: Don’t Spend Valuable Time Inputting Data into QuickBooks
- 06-18-22
- Diane Glover