Remote Work Policies Can Bring Up Some Thorny Issues
Kirsch CPA Group
Jun 08, 2022
You and your valued employees who work far from headquarters can encounter two administrative issues that possibly neither of you contemplated when the remote-working arrangement was agreed to:
- What happens to health benefits if there are no providers in your plan’s network where the remote employee has moved, and
- When employees move to another state, which taxing jurisdiction has a claim on them?
Here are points to consider and some alternatives.
Remote Employee Health Benefits
When it comes to health benefits for remote employees, you have a few options, but their practicality depends on your circumstances. Suppose, for example, that a remote worker lives too far from the geographic area covered by the preferred providers in your health plan’s network to make routine visits. He or she could, however, make the trip if a serious condition required a physical examination.
The simplest approach in that situation could be to arrange for the employee to use telemedicine services with in-network providers for most needs. In-person would be available when necessary.
But that may not always be a practical option, particularly if you have multiple employees who are working remotely and are too far away from your plan’s provider network. In that case, you may need to ask your health plan administrator if a special arrangement can be made with a primary care group in close proximity to where remote employees are working. Be aware that such a customized arrangement, if even possible, could carry significant extra costs.
If you’re expecting a big increase in the proportion of your staff that works remotely, another possibility would be to switch your health plan provider to one that operates on a national scale. The downside to that option is it could take a year or more to fully implement, and not many plans have that capacity and aren’t available in all areas.
Another possibility would be to pay remote employees a stipend to cover the cost of securing an individual health policy. That could be expensive, depending on such factors as:
- The cost of the coverage,
- Whether it’s necessary to keep the employee on your regular health plan for Affordable Care Act compliance purposes, and
- Whether the arrangement, which may look like a “raise,” could create pressure from other employees to be treated “fairly” by also receiving the equivalent of the stipend.
While that third possibility isn’t probably one you would encounter, it’s worth keeping in the back of your mind.
The ICHRA Option
Finally, if you’re willing to zero-base your entire health benefit strategy, you might consider an Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangement (ICHRA). Instead of having your own company health plan to cover employees, with an ICHRA, you simply reimburse all employees eligible for health benefits for their cost of securing coverage on their own.
ICHRAs have been available only since 2020 and are subject to strict IRS regulations to assure compliance with the Affordable Care Act. You probably wouldn’t switch to an ICHRA just to support a few employees working remotely. But if an ICHRA would make sense for other reasons, it could support your effort to enable remote workers to remain covered.
Battle of the States
What about the state payroll tax obligations of out-of-state remote employees? This issue has been a thorn in the side of many employers since pre-COVID-19 days. Rules vary from state to state, but the growth of out-of-state remote working arrangements has brought it home for the first time to some employers.
Employees usually receive a tax credit in their state for taxes paid to another state and thus don’t face double taxation. But this can still be a nuisance for employers to administer and for employees who must file tax returns in two states. Plus, not all states allow for that offset.
Convenience Rule
One general principle that six states, including New York, operate under is called the “convenience rule.” An example might be an employee who works for a company whose office is in New York but who telecommutes from New Jersey, for the convenience of the employer. New York considers the days the employee telecommuted from New Jersey to be days worked in New York. The only way around that would be for the employer to demonstrate a business necessity for the employee to be working from New Jersey and establish a “bona fide” satellite office there.
Other states that operate under the convenience rule, according to the Tax Foundation, are Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Nebraska and Pennsylvania. Massachusetts temporarily adopted that policy when the pandemic was in full force. Neighboring New Hampshire challenged it in a case that made it to the U.S. Supreme Court, but was shot down.
Final Thoughts
The bottom line for employers who are either putting together a remote work policy or dealing with the implications of having already given employees that opportunity is the need for clarity. Employees should know how their status as remote workers affects their health benefits and the payroll tax implications that go with that status. Given the technical nature of the subject, be sure to consult with your accounting professional as you weigh the pros and cons.
Contact us to learn more about remote employee benefits
© Copyright 2022. All rights reserved.
About The Author
Kirsch CPA Group is a full service CPA and business advisory firm helping businesses and organizations with accounting,…
Tags
Sign Up for Email Updates
Related Articles
Do You Know How SECURE 2.0 Will Affect Your Manufacturing Company?
- 03-16-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
Top 3 Federal Tax Law Changes that Could Affect Your Business Return
- 03-02-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
What Are the Most Common Form 990 Mistakes Not-for-Profits Make?
- 02-16-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
8 Ways to Insulate Your Construction Company Against Rising Costs
- 02-10-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
Tax Treatment of Debt Forgiveness: Watch Out for Tax Bills Delivered COD
- 01-18-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
Manufacturers: Be Aware of These 3 Business Tax Provisions Currently in Limbo
- 01-18-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
The Tax Deductible Mileage Rate for Business Driving Increases for 2023
- 01-04-23
- Kirsch CPA Group
Succession Planning Considerations for Construction Business Owners
- 12-14-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Prevent Fraud at Your Construction Company With a Holistic Approach
- 11-30-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Manufacturers Must Act Now to Maximize Depreciation-Related Tax Breaks for 2022
- 11-09-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
It’s Time for Businesses to Rethink Their Working Capital Practices
- 11-09-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Social Security Wage Base and Earnings Test Amounts Increase in 2023
- 10-27-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
New Law Enhances Payroll Tax Break for Small Manufacturers’ Research Expenses
- 10-13-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
How Buy-Sell Agreements Factor into Business Owners’ Estate Plans
- 09-14-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
SALT Cap Workaround Law Could Save Ohio Business Owners Over $100 Million
- 08-31-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
How Manufacturing Companies Can Benefit from the Section 179 Expensing Deduction
- 08-04-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Could the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Help Your Construction Company?
- 06-23-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Good News: IRS Boosts Standard Mileage Rates for Second Half of 2022
- 06-23-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Education Benefits Can Help You Recruit and Retain Smart Employees
- 05-26-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Ensure Your Construction Accounting System Has the Right Features
- 05-12-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
John Kirsch Named to Greater Butler and Warren Counties Business Hall of Fame
- 03-25-22
- Diane Glover
Manufacturers Need to Act Soon to Take Advantage of 100% First-year Bonus Depreciation
- 03-17-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Commission Fraud: Salespeople Getting Paid More Than They’ve Earned
- 02-04-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
Consider a New Approach to Meeting Your Business Real Estate Need
- 09-17-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
Beware: Teleworking Arrangements May Cause State Tax Withholding Issues
- 08-18-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
5 Common Construction Accounting Risks — and How to Address Them
- 07-07-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
Supreme Court Finds No Standing to Challenge a Provision of the ACA
- 06-24-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
Labor Shortage: Unlock Solutions by Evaluating Your Employment Value Proposition
- 06-09-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
Material Participation Standard is the Key to Unlocking LLC Tax Losses
- 05-27-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
Know Your Legal Obligations Under the Americans with Disabilities Act
- 05-13-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
PPP Loan Not Forgiven? There’s a Safe Harbor for Deducting Expenses
- 12-03-20
- Kirsch CPA Group
What You Need to Know About the Deferral of Payroll Tax Obligations
- 09-15-20
- Kirsch CPA Group
PPP Loan Forgiveness – Significant Borrower Friendly Changes on the Horizon
- 06-04-20
- John Kirsch
Tax Filing Deadline Remains April 15 – Payment Due Extended to July 15
- 03-19-20
- John Kirsch
Prepare to Receive a Social Security Administration No-Match Letter
- 10-15-19
- Kirsch CPA Group
IRS Announces Changes for Personal Use of Employer-Provided Vehicles
- 06-10-19
- Diane Glover
Watch Out for these Tax Issues When Planning for Your Business in 2018
- 06-26-18
- Diane Glover
What Image Does Your Organization Present to Large Contributors?
- 03-15-18
- Kirsch CPA Group
8 strategies to help you adapt to economic down turn without layoffs
- 02-24-18
- Diane Glover
Remember To Take Required Minimum Distributions at Age 70 1/2 Or Face Penalties
- 02-17-17
- Sue Schloemer
Time is Money: Don’t Spend Valuable Time Inputting Data into QuickBooks
- 06-18-22
- Diane Glover