Supreme Court Finds No Standing to Challenge a Provision of the ACA
Kirsch CPA Group
Jun 24, 2021

A number of states and individual taxpayers sought to challenge the constitutionality of a provision in the Affordable Care Act (ACA). In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that both the state and individual plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the ACA’s minimum essential coverage provision. Since the plaintiffs lacked standing, the Court didn’t address the validity of the law. The Court reversed the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had found that some of the plaintiffs did have standing and that the provision was unconstitutional. (California v. Texas, 6/17/2021)
Background
The ACA as it was enacted in 2010 required most Americans to obtain minimum essential health insurance coverage and imposed a monetary penalty upon most individuals who failed to do so.
Amendments to the law in 2017 effectively nullified the penalty by setting its amount to $0. Subsequently, Texas (along with over a dozen states and two individuals) brought suit against federal officials, claiming that without the penalty ACA’s minimum essential coverage provision was unconstitutional.
The plaintiffs sought a declaration that the provision was unconstitutional and the rest of ACA isn’t severable from it. They also sought an injunction against enforcement of the rest of the law. A U.S. District Court determined that the individual plaintiffs had standing. It also found the provision both unconstitutional and not severable from the rest of the Act.
The Fifth Circuit agreed as to the existence of standing and the unconstitutionality of the provision, but concluded that the district court’s severability analysis provided insufficient justification to strike down the entire law.
Reversed and Remanded
The Supreme Court, reversing the Fifth Circuit, held that the plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge the minimum essential coverage provision because they haven’t shown a past or future injury fairly traceable to the government’s conduct enforcing the provision.
Since the Court said the plaintiffs didn’t have standing, the Court didn’t reach the question of the law’s validity.
Justice Stephen Breyer delivered the opinion, in which Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Elena Kagan, Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined. Justice Samuel Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Neil Gorsuch joined.
Contact us to learn more about the Affordable Care Act
© Copyright 2021. All rights reserved.

About The Author
Kirsch CPA Group is a full service CPA and business advisory firm helping businesses and organizations with accounting,…
Tags
Sign Up for Email Updates
Related Articles









Ensure Your Construction Accounting System Has the Right Features
- 05-12-22
- Kirsch CPA Group


















John Kirsch Named to Greater Butler and Warren Counties Business Hall of Fame
- 03-25-22
- Diane Glover






Manufacturers Need to Act Soon to Take Advantage of 100% First-year Bonus Depreciation
- 03-17-22
- Kirsch CPA Group



























Commission Fraud: Salespeople Getting Paid More Than They’ve Earned
- 02-04-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
















































Consider a New Approach to Meeting Your Business Real Estate Need
- 09-17-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
























Beware: Teleworking Arrangements May Cause State Tax Withholding Issues
- 08-18-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
























5 Common Construction Accounting Risks — and How to Address Them
- 07-07-21
- Kirsch CPA Group





















Labor Shortage: Unlock Solutions by Evaluating Your Employment Value Proposition
- 06-09-21
- Kirsch CPA Group









Material Participation Standard is the Key to Unlocking LLC Tax Losses
- 05-27-21
- Kirsch CPA Group









Know Your Legal Obligations Under the Americans with Disabilities Act
- 05-13-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
























PPP Loan Not Forgiven? There’s a Safe Harbor for Deducting Expenses
- 12-03-20
- Kirsch CPA Group












What You Need to Know About the Deferral of Payroll Tax Obligations
- 09-15-20
- Kirsch CPA Group


















PPP Loan Forgiveness – Significant Borrower Friendly Changes on the Horizon
- 06-04-20
- John Kirsch





















Tax Filing Deadline Remains April 15 – Payment Due Extended to July 15
- 03-19-20
- John Kirsch








































































Prepare to Receive a Social Security Administration No-Match Letter
- 10-15-19
- Kirsch CPA Group





















IRS Announces Changes for Personal Use of Employer-Provided Vehicles
- 06-10-19
- Diane Glover






























Watch Out for these Tax Issues When Planning for Your Business in 2018
- 06-26-18
- Diane Glover









What Image Does Your Organization Present to Large Contributors?
- 03-15-18
- Kirsch CPA Group



8 strategies to help you adapt to economic down turn without layoffs
- 02-24-18
- Diane Glover













































Remember To Take Required Minimum Distributions at Age 70 1/2 Or Face Penalties
- 02-17-17
- Sue Schloemer








































