Tied Down to Your 401(k) Plan’s Cost? Discover the Alternatives
Kirsch CPA Group
Dec 31, 2019

Before 401(k) plans burst onto the employee benefit scene in the 1980s and traditional pension plans had not yet gone nearly extinct, there were profit-sharing plans. The purpose of these plans, as the name suggests, was to spread some of your profits around the workforce.
But as 401(k) plans emerged, they were often incorporated into an existing profit-sharing plan structure, which shares the same “defined contribution” plan format. That opened the door wider for employees to add to their retirement savings, as they do today.
Over time, old-school pensions started to fall by the wayside. As they did, employers began to counterbalance the termination of those pensions by committing themselves to make fixed formula-based contributions to employees’ 401(k) accounts, as annual contributions or as part of a matching formula. The role of a company’s profit in determining contribution amounts has faded since then.
The most recent survey by the Plan Sponsor Council of America (PSCA) indicates that only about 5% of plan sponsors match amounts set aside by employees on a discretionary basis and make no other contributions. Four percent make discretionary non-matching contributions exclusively. More employers use a combination of fixed and discretionary contributions.
Linking to Profits
There’s much to be said for tying discretionary contributions to profits. For starters, say you’ve had a bad year and belt-tightening is in order. Suspending contributions to your 401(k) plan, whether your basic formula is matching or otherwise, could help you conserve cash. On the flip side, there’s the underlying concept of the profit-sharing plan that pre-dated the 401(k): That is, profit-sharing plans demonstrate to employees that their collective efforts to bring financial success to the enterprise will be rewarded.
Keep in mind that with or without profits, if your profit-sharing plan is incorporated into a 401(k), employees will still be able to set aside a portion of their earnings, regardless of what you do.
There are different ways to structure a 401(k) with a profit-sharing component. Begin with deciding how much of your profits to allocate to the profit-sharing plan overall. For example, if you want to make a point to your employees about the degree of your commitment to the profit-sharing concept, you could establish a formula linked to your profits that would determine the amount.
Alternatively, you could make that determination entirely discretionary. Suppose you have a profitable year, but you know that you will be making heavy capital expenditures next year, and you need to accumulate some cash for that purpose. In that scenario, keeping your options open makes sense.
Divvying Up the Profit Pool
The next plan design decision is how profits that are set aside for the plan are to be divvied up among plan participants. The simplest method is to give everyone an amount based on a fixed percentage of their compensation.
Let’s say your profits allow you to contribute $100,000 over the next 12 months. Your annual payroll for full-time employees covered by the profit-sharing 401(k) is $2 million. Five percent of $2 million is $100,000, so you’d make contributions to each plan participant equal to 5% of their pay. Or you could contribute at that pace with each pay period if you’re confident you can afford that amount.
As it happens, 5% of payroll corresponds to the average employer contribution for all 401(k)s, according to the PSCA survey.
There are two other ways to go, however. And these alternative contribution formulas are available to you even if you don’t have a profit-sharing component. They offer a way, subject to discrimination testing limits, to steer a higher allocation of employer contributions to older or higher-earning employees.
Workforce Segmentation
One is called cross-testing. It involves splitting your workforce into two or more groups. A typical dividing line is highly compensated employees (HCEs) and business owners in one group, and everyone else in another. Different contribution percentages for each group are limited by a formula based on the proportion of the average benefit relative to the same calculation for the lower-paid group.
It would allow, for example, a company with two HCEs, ages 50 and 45, in one group each earning $245,000 to contribute $49,000 to the profit-sharing retirement accounts of both HCEs (that is, a total of $98,000). And the company could contribute less than $8,000 for four non-HCE and younger employees combined. In this illustration, if a uniform contribution rate was used instead, the combined contribution to the lower-paid group would be close to $25,000.
The other method, called an age-weighted formula, is similar to cross-testing but doesn’t involve creating distinct employee groups.
Using the alternative contribution formulas involves more number-crunching administrative work to ensure that they clear discrimination testing hurdles. Plus, some workforce demographic patterns lend themselves better than others to steering larger contributions to the more senior group. Still, assuming no philosophical objections, it might be worth investigating.
Final Thoughts
You may, in the end, decide to stick to a simpler, uniform percentage of compensation approach. If so, linking employer retirement plan contributions to your profits still allows for options. One downside to keep in mind, however, is that the less certain employees are that the company will be assisting them with their retirement savings, the less value they might assign to your 401(k) plan. And that may undermine their commitment to you.
If you need help determining what is best for your business contact us at 513.858.6040.

About The Author
Kirsch CPA Group is a full service CPA and business advisory firm helping businesses and organizations with accounting,…
Tags
Sign Up for Email Updates
Related Articles



Tax Treatment of Debt Forgiveness: Watch Out for Tax Bills Delivered COD
- 01-18-23
- Kirsch CPA Group












Manufacturers: Be Aware of These 3 Business Tax Provisions Currently in Limbo
- 01-18-23
- Kirsch CPA Group



The Tax Deductible Mileage Rate for Business Driving Increases for 2023
- 01-04-23
- Kirsch CPA Group









Succession Planning Considerations for Construction Business Owners
- 12-14-22
- Kirsch CPA Group






Prevent Fraud at Your Construction Company With a Holistic Approach
- 11-30-22
- Kirsch CPA Group









Manufacturers Must Act Now to Maximize Depreciation-Related Tax Breaks for 2022
- 11-09-22
- Kirsch CPA Group



It’s Time for Businesses to Rethink Their Working Capital Practices
- 11-09-22
- Kirsch CPA Group









Social Security Wage Base and Earnings Test Amounts Increase in 2023
- 10-27-22
- Kirsch CPA Group



New Law Enhances Payroll Tax Break for Small Manufacturers’ Research Expenses
- 10-13-22
- Kirsch CPA Group







































How Buy-Sell Agreements Factor into Business Owners’ Estate Plans
- 09-14-22
- Kirsch CPA Group









SALT Cap Workaround Law Could Save Ohio Business Owners Over $100 Million
- 08-31-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
























How Manufacturing Companies Can Benefit from the Section 179 Expensing Deduction
- 08-04-22
- Kirsch CPA Group



























Could the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Help Your Construction Company?
- 06-23-22
- Kirsch CPA Group






Good News: IRS Boosts Standard Mileage Rates for Second Half of 2022
- 06-23-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
























Education Benefits Can Help You Recruit and Retain Smart Employees
- 05-26-22
- Kirsch CPA Group









Ensure Your Construction Accounting System Has the Right Features
- 05-12-22
- Kirsch CPA Group





















John Kirsch Named to Greater Butler and Warren Counties Business Hall of Fame
- 03-25-22
- Diane Glover






Manufacturers Need to Act Soon to Take Advantage of 100% First-year Bonus Depreciation
- 03-17-22
- Kirsch CPA Group



























Commission Fraud: Salespeople Getting Paid More Than They’ve Earned
- 02-04-22
- Kirsch CPA Group
















































Consider a New Approach to Meeting Your Business Real Estate Need
- 09-17-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
























Beware: Teleworking Arrangements May Cause State Tax Withholding Issues
- 08-18-21
- Kirsch CPA Group
























5 Common Construction Accounting Risks — and How to Address Them
- 07-07-21
- Kirsch CPA Group















Supreme Court Finds No Standing to Challenge a Provision of the ACA
- 06-24-21
- Kirsch CPA Group






Labor Shortage: Unlock Solutions by Evaluating Your Employment Value Proposition
- 06-09-21
- Kirsch CPA Group









Material Participation Standard is the Key to Unlocking LLC Tax Losses
- 05-27-21
- Kirsch CPA Group









Know Your Legal Obligations Under the Americans with Disabilities Act
- 05-13-21
- Kirsch CPA Group



























PPP Loan Not Forgiven? There’s a Safe Harbor for Deducting Expenses
- 12-03-20
- Kirsch CPA Group












What You Need to Know About the Deferral of Payroll Tax Obligations
- 09-15-20
- Kirsch CPA Group


















PPP Loan Forgiveness – Significant Borrower Friendly Changes on the Horizon
- 06-04-20
- John Kirsch





















Tax Filing Deadline Remains April 15 – Payment Due Extended to July 15
- 03-19-20
- John Kirsch





































































Prepare to Receive a Social Security Administration No-Match Letter
- 10-15-19
- Kirsch CPA Group





















IRS Announces Changes for Personal Use of Employer-Provided Vehicles
- 06-10-19
- Diane Glover






























Watch Out for these Tax Issues When Planning for Your Business in 2018
- 06-26-18
- Diane Glover









What Image Does Your Organization Present to Large Contributors?
- 03-15-18
- Kirsch CPA Group



8 strategies to help you adapt to economic down turn without layoffs
- 02-24-18
- Diane Glover













































Remember To Take Required Minimum Distributions at Age 70 1/2 Or Face Penalties
- 02-17-17
- Sue Schloemer







































Time is Money: Don’t Spend Valuable Time Inputting Data into QuickBooks
- 06-18-22
- Diane Glover




